This information came as the collusion stories were turning into a frenzy that would last years. His early 2017 memo affirmed that there was no evidence of any individuals in collusion with Russians. Yet, the media seems uninterested in how this countervailing information was buried, even in briefings to the intelligence committees.Īnother declassified document shows that, after the New York Times ran a leaked story on the investigation, even Strzok had balked at the account as misleading and inaccurate the year before. Both Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein and former Acting Attorney General Sally Yates testified that they would not have signed off on surveillance if they knew this information at the time. Yet it continued the investigation, and then someone leaked its existence to the media. In 2017, key agents were aware that the basis for the FISA applications were dubious and likely false. Indeed, Steele’s allegations were quickly discredited by the FBI. FBI agents had already warned that dossier author Christopher Steele may have been used by Russian intelligence to plant false information to disrupt the election. Keep in mind that this is a statement made in 2018. The statement that most stands out from the briefing is that the Primary Sub-source “did not cite any significant concerns with the way his reporting was characterized in the dossier to the extent he could identify it.” This occurred after the FBI misled the FISA court, including the submission of falsified documents to continue the surveillance. It is hard to read the document linked below and not conclude that the FBI misled the Congress on the subject. The latest information comes from the Senate Intelligence Committee which released a declassified briefing report to the Senate Intelligence Committee in 2018 on the Steele dossier’s Primary Sub-source. I recently wrote a column concerning a pattern of willful blindness by the media as new evidence emerges of serious wrongdoing by the FBI in the origin and continuation of the Russian collusion investigation.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |